Background
One factor reliability DOE can
be used in design comparison and factor effect identification.
Suppose that there are three
different materials that can be used in a product. The engineer
wants to know if there is a difference between these three
choices and, if there is a difference, which material is the
best choice in terms of the product life.
Ten samples were tested for
each material. The test was stopped at 500 hours.
Experiment
Design
The engineer uses DOE++ to
design a one factor reliability design. The design-specific
settings and the factor properties used are shown next.


The design matrix and the response data are given
in the "3 Levels One Factor" Folio. Analysis
Part I
Step 1: After
performing the experiment according to the design and recording
the results, the engineer enters the data set into the Standard Folio, as shown next.

Step 2: The Weibull
distribution is chosen for the analysis.
Step 3: The data set is
analyzed with the default risk (significance) level of 0.1.
The Likelihood Ratio Test table from the Analysis tab is shown next.

This table provides the test for
the overall effect of the factor. A small p
value indicates that the factor (treatment) has a significant
effect on the response.
The second table is the MLE
Information table, as shown next.

This table gives the value of
the estimated parameters in the model. A small
p value indicates that the parameter
is significantly different from 0.
The third table, the Life
Characteristic Summary table, displays the fitted life
characteristic. For the Weibull distribution, the life
characteristic is eta, the scale parameter, as shown next.

The last table, the Life
Comparisons table, shows paired comparisons of the life at each
level, as shown next.

Step 4: A Response vs.
Level plot is created, as shown next.

From this plot, it is difficult to
tell which material is the best.
Step 5: A
Life Characteristic
plot is created, as shown next.

This plot shows that material
type C has the largest eta value, which means it has the longest
expected life.
Conclusions
The Likelihood Ratio Test Table shows that there is a
significant difference between the three types of material. Most
notably, from the paired comparison, it is apparent that there
are significant differences between A and B and between A and C.
The difference between B and C is not particularly significant. |